This morning on the way to my Chinese art class I walked past the senior honours thesis exhibition for visual art concentrators and was struck by one student's work (Lauren Khoo). The title is Disconsolate and the medium used is cibachrome and acrylic. It's picture of a woman whose only visible part of her face perched on the bathtub. It is suggested that she's either dead or severely injured since there's blood running down from her mouth. One arm sticks out and there is this glamourous diamond bracelet on the wrist. On the floor lies her handbag and what I take to be a scarf. And that's it. I'm so drawn to this piece and have made it a point to revisit it for more than three times already. While other students' works showcase somewhat abstract paintings on various kinds of materials, Khoo's is the only one that uses photography as a medium. I will take a picture and put it up if I can. I'm totally mesmerised.
And that led me to thinking in retrospect about my obsession with glamour shots, cryptic contemporary photography that suggests female sexuality and eroticism, and today's female celebrities (Eva Longoria, Paris Hilton, etc) who embody such qualities. It's never outright sexual or an in-your-face sexiness or cheap Playboy. Rather, it's more often than not simply suggested, subtle, yet exuberantly pretentious. Not that I've never thought about this before, but I certainly have never fleshed this thought out in such a concrete, well-founded manner. Strangely enough, when it comes to design, on the one hand I'm a big fan of minimalism, simplicity, sparkling glass, and subdued elegance in black&white (true style never shouts kind of philosophy), but the other hand, this glam style with a hint of rococo, Arabesque, and Victorian vintage is just mesmerising to look at. Interesting indeed.
Examples include but are not limited to the pictures below, with the first one hitting the hugest nail on the head:
08 November 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
how about this ;-)
http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2005/11/30/arts/30whit_CA2.html
http://www.artnet.com/artist/11881/marilyn-minter.html
oops.. first link should be
http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2005/11/30/
arts/30whit_CA2.html
paris looks gorgeous! too bad she looks malnourished in all her non-glamour photos.
http://www.topmodelgates.com/MonaValentinoRocknRose02.jpg howz about this? it's the ad for rock 'n rose by valentino. it smells sooooooooo amazing! i'm like, in love.
Post a Comment